Living in a Battleground: Presidential Campaigns and Fundamental Predictors of Vote Choice

نویسندگان

  • Scott D. McClurg
  • Thomas M. Holbrook
چکیده

Little evidence links the strategic decisions of campaigns to individual-level voting behavior. Yet for campaigns to matter in the way that experts argue, exposure to campaigns must also matter so there should be observable differences in the structure of vote choice between battleground and non-battleground states. Combining presidential campaign data with the Senate Election Study, we show that intense campaigning can activate factors like race, ideology, partisanship, and presidential approval. We find that the campaigns affected different variables in 1988 than in 1992, which we hypothesize is the consequence of campaign messages. Holbrook and McClurg, “Mechanisms, p. 1

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Do Nebraska and Maine Have the Right Idea? The Political and Partisan Implications of the District System

Robert C. Turner Skidmore College Abstract After the 2000 presidential election, twenty-one states considered legislation to award their presidential electors using the district system, wherein one elector is awarded to the popular vote winner of each congressional district and the two state electors are awarded to the popular vote winner statewide. Historically, the district system is viewed a...

متن کامل

Using Battleground States as a Natural Experiment to Test Theories of Voting*

We use variation produced by the Electoral College—the creation of battleground and non battleground states—to examine explanations for why people vote. We employ a longer time series (1980-2008) than previous research to gauge the effect of battleground status on state-level turnout. Our model includes (1) midterm elections, allowing us to directly compare the effect of battleground status wit...

متن کامل

Moral Issues and Voter Decision Making in the 2004 Presidential Election

Although the 2004 presidential election was predicted to be razor close, Republican President George W. Bush became the first candidate to win a majority of the popular vote since his father in 1988. Bush’s coattails extended to the U.S. Congress as well, with Republican gains in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Journalists and pundits immediately attributed Republican success ...

متن کامل

Advertising Competition in Presidential Elections∗

Presidential candidates choose advertising strategically across markets based on each state’s potential to tip the election. The winner-take-all rules in the Electoral College concentrate advertising in battleground states, ignoring the majority of voters. We develop an empirical games approach to estimate an equilibrium model of competition between candidates and to compare outcomes under the ...

متن کامل

Feeding the Hand that Bit You: Voting for Ex-authoritarian Rulers in Russia and Bolivia

What could be motivating voters in transition countries to vote for leaders who have proven themselves to be skilled at violating human rights, repressing civil liberties, and ruling without democratic institutions? We test hypotheses related to this question by using a least-similar-systems design in which we search for common predictors of vote choice in presidential elections from two countr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015